ユネスコに厳重抗議 「南京大虐殺文書」記憶遺産登録決定は恥ずべき暴挙で

ユネスコに厳重抗議 「南京大虐殺文書」記憶遺産登録決定は恥ずべき暴挙である。再審査、取り消しを勧告する（「史実を世界に発信する会」）。
「南京大虐殺」なるものは、戦時謀略宣伝にすぎないということを当会では再三にわたって明らかにする文書を英文で発表し、ウェブサイトに掲載してきた。書籍６点、論文／主張等２０点以上に昇る。
http://hassin.org
なかでも、胡錦濤主席が平成２０年５月来日の折に、南京事件研究グループ「南京事件の真実を検証する会」（会長：加瀬英明）が提出した公開質問状が重要なものである。南京事件が成立するために決定的な重要ポイント５点につき、成り立ち得ないことを説明し、反論を求めたものである。
中文の公開質問状を、駐日中国大使館に送付すると同時に、ウェブサイトに、中・英・日文の公開質問状を掲載し、またこれをNewsletter により、内外に発信した。下記のとおりである。
中文：http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_3/18_S1.pdf
英文：http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_3/17_S1.pdf
日文：http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/19_S1.pdf

胡錦濤主席、またそれに代わった習近平主席からもこれに対する返答は来ていない。
返答できるはずがないと我々は考えているものであるが、ユネスコは最低限、これに対する回答を中国政府に求め、その結果に基づいて登録の可否を決めるべきである。
一方的な主張と客観性を書く証拠文書に基づいて「記憶遺産」に登録するなどということは、道義的にも学問的にも認められるものではない。再考を強く要求するものである。
平成２７年１０月１２日 「史実を世界に発信する会」

結果 (英語) 1:

UNESCO strictly protest South Nanking Massacre document memory legacy enrollment decision is shameful outrage. Recommend re-examination, cancel ("submitted to the world historical society"). "Nanjing massacre" which have been posted on the website and announced that things only conspiracy propaganda war in our society over again and again to reveal documents in English. Book thesis / claim and six-point rises to more than 20 points.http://Hassin.orgAmong them, Chinese President Hu Jintao will 5/2008 on the occasion of the visit to Japan, Nanjing incident research group should be an important open letter "to verify the truth of Nanking Committee (Chairman: KASE Hideaki) submitted. Should be asked to refute, that won't work for the Nanjing incident is decisively important points 5 points per. Chinese open letter sent to the Chinese Embassy and at the same time, on the website in English, open letter, statement, and also this Newsletter that transmitted to the inside and outside. Are as listed below.Statement in:http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_3/18_S1.pdfEnglish of:http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_3/17_S1.pdfStatement,:http://hassin.org/01/wp-content/uploads/19_S1.pdf President XI Jinping joined Chinese President Hu Jintao, also it's not coming is the answer for this. Couldn't answer what you're thinking is we have UNESCO seeks Beijing answer to this, at a minimum, should decide whether the registration based on the results. Also, such as registering a "heritage memory" based on evidence document write objectivity with a unilateral claim that moral is not academically accepted. In urge to reconsider.10/12/2015 of the facts is submitted to the world

結果 (英語) 2:

Strict protest "Nanjing Massacre document" storage Heritage decision to UNESCO is the outrage is shameful. Re-examination, to recommend revocation ("Association for transmitting a historical fact to the world").
"Nanjing Massacre" made ​​things, the revealing document over again and again in our society that it is not only in wartime conspiracy propaganda announced in English, have been posted on the web site. Books 6 points, rising to more than 20 points paper / claim, or the like.
http://hassin.org
Among them, the folding of President Hu Jintao is in May 2008 visit to Japan, Nanjing incident research group "meeting to verify the truth of the Nanjing Incident" (President: Hideaki Kase) open letter that was submitted it is important. per decisive important point five points for the Nanjing incident is established, it is explained that can not be origins, it is what was asked for rebuttal.
The Chinese of the open letter, and at the same time be sent to the Embassy of the Chinese Embassy, ​​the web site, posted the middle, English, Nichibun of the open letter, this by Newsletter was also calling in and out. It is as follows.
Chinese: http: //www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_3/18_S1.pdf
English: http: //www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_3/17_S1.pdf
Nichibun: http: //hassin.org/01/ wp-content / uploads / 19_S1.pdf reply did not come to this from President Hu Jintao, also Xi Jinping chief that was handed to it. While the user is not supposed to be reply we are those believes, UNESCO minimum, obtains the answer to this the Chinese government, it should determine whether the registration based on the result. Unilateral claim that it is that such registers to be "memory heritage" based on the evidence document to write objectivity is not intended to be recognized also in the moral to be academic. Reconsider is intended to request strongly. October 12, 2015 "meeting that transmits historical fact to the world."

結果 (英語) 3:

Strong protest by UNESCO Nanjing Massacre "document" is a shameful outrage memory heritage. Review and recommendations to cancel (Historical Society in the world "). The "massacre" Nanjing becomes large, and in wartime propaganda and plot in this document to clarify and announced in English, published on the website. Article 6 the book, and to claim, etc. more than 20 points. Even in the hassin at http: / / org, Hu Jintao in May 2008, JapanVerification of "Nanjing case study group Nanjing incident truth" (Chairman: Hideaki Kase) submitted by the open letter is important. The important point to point is decisive for the establishment of the Nanjing explained that cannot be made up for that. Open letter to the sentence in the Chinese Embassy in Tokyo, sent to the website and published in English and Chinese: an open letter to the Newsletter in the inside and outside. As shown below. In the http:Fact book / www.agon. COM / 3 / 18 / 02 CL S PDF English 1.0 at: http: / / CL fact book. COM / 02 / 3 / 17 S 1 PDF how http: / / hassin. Org / 01 / WP content uploads / 19 S 1. Hu Jintao, PDF, too, and it is from Xi Jinping president on behalf of this reply to come. There is no reply that we should be at a minimum, UNESCO, seeking answers to the Chinese government, as a result, should decide on whether or not registered. AtA one-sided document evidence, objectivity, and claims that the registration memory "and" moral, not to be found in the study. It is strongly demanded. October 12, 2007 at 27 years history "into the world"